Claims

The 46% of adult learners classified as gainers had higher pretest reading and phonological awareness scores and included fewer adults with a history of special education (Scarborough et al.)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Gainers (46% of the sample) had higher pretest scores than non-gainers on measures of reading and phonological awareness, and included fewer adults with a history of special education. → Mary Beth Calhoon 2013

Evidence

Mary Beth Calhoon 2013

Mary Beth Calhoon, Hollis S. Scarborough, Brett Miller. (2013). Interventions for struggling adolescent and adult readers: instructional, learner, and situational differences. Read Writ 26:489–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9442-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports individual-level findings from Scarborough et al.'s adult literacy study using WIGROT gain classification: "The 46 % of the sample who were classified as gainers had higher pretest scores than non-gainers" on reading and phonological awareness measures.

"The 46 % of the sample who were classified as gainers had higher pretest scores than non-gainers on measures of reading and phonological awareness, and included fewer adults with a history of special education."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id adult-gainers-higher-pretest-scores
title The 46% of adult learners classified as gainers had higher pretest reading and phonological awareness scores and included fewer adults with a history of special education (Scarborough et al.)
description The 46% of adult learners classified as gainers had higher pretest reading and phonological awareness scores and included fewer adults with a history of special education (Scarborough et al.)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mary-beth-calhoon-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.