Claims

Thematic analysis indicates intervention participants perceived numerous positive physical, psychological, and social outcomes from the inclusive aquatic exercise class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interview thematic analysis yielded three primary themes and eight subthemes based on 19 codes, with participants reporting perceived physical, psychological, and social benefits similar to those reported for able-bodied university students. → Dysterheft 2016

Evidence

Dysterheft 2016

Dysterheft, J., Chaparro, G., Rice, L., & Rice, I. (2016). Investigating the Outcomes and Perceptions of an Inclusive Aquatic Exercise Class for University Students with Physical Disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(1), 41-56. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Investigating+the+Outcomes+and+Perceptions+of+an+Inclusive+Aquatic+Exercise+Class

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative thematic analysis of post-intervention interviews with the six intervention participants, coded by three researchers with an independent auditor. The analysis "resulted in three primary themes and eight subthemes based on 19 codes"; all participants reported physical and psychological benefits, and four of six reported peer benefits.

"Analysis of the interview transcriptions resulted in three primary themes and eight subthemes based on 19 codes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.