Claims

Explicit affective strategy training significantly improved Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners' oral language proficiency compared with a placebo control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After six weeks of explicit affective strategy instruction, the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group on the oral post-test (p<0.05). → Mostafavi and Vahdany 2016

Evidence

Mostafavi and Vahdany 2016

Fatemeh Mostafavi, Fereidoon Vahdany. (2016). The Effect of Explicit Affective Strategy Training on Iranian EFL learners' Oral Language Proficiency and Anxiety Reduction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.197

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test comparing post-test oral scores of the experimental group (mean 4.53, SD 1.63) and control group (mean 3.56, SD 1.52), each n=30, after the experimental group received "six weeks of affective strategy instruction". The difference was significant (p<0.05); no effect size was printed.

"The results of independent samples t-test for the post-test scores in tables 4.9, and 4.10 indicated that there was a significant difference between the two groups in their post- test (p<0.05)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.