Claims

The experimental group's anxiety control changed significantly from pre- to post-treatment while the control group's did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's anxiety control changed significantly after explicit affective strategy teaching (paired t=-11.6, p=0.00). → Mostafavi and Vahdany 2016 q3 i? The control group showed no significant difference in anxiety control between the first and second questionnaire administrations (p>0.05). → Mostafavi and Vahdany 2016 (2)

Evidence

Mostafavi and Vahdany 2016

Fatemeh Mostafavi, Fereidoon Vahdany. (2016). The Effect of Explicit Affective Strategy Training on Iranian EFL learners' Oral Language Proficiency and Anxiety Reduction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.197

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test within the experimental group (n=30): questionnaire mean rose from 2.52 (SD .97) to 3.73 (SD .72); paired difference mean -1.20, t=-11.6, df=29, p=0.00. No effect size was printed.

"Based on the results of paired samples t- test, there is a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental group in pre and post administration of the questionnaire (p<0.05), that is: the experimental group’s level of anxiety control has been changed significantly after explicit teaching of affective strategies."

Mostafavi and Vahdany 2016 (2)

Fatemeh Mostafavi, Fereidoon Vahdany. (2016). The Effect of Explicit Affective Strategy Training on Iranian EFL learners' Oral Language Proficiency and Anxiety Reduction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.197

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test within the control group (n=30): questionnaire means 2.52 (first) and 2.55 (second); paired t=-.7, df=29, p=.48. No effect size was printed; equivalence was not tested.

"Based on the results of table 4.8, there is no significant difference between the mean scores of the control group in first and second administration of the questionnaire (p>0.05), that is: the control group participants were almost at the same level of anxiety control both at the beginning and at the end of the study."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.