Claims

An after-school EF/VS intervention improves directly assessed executive function in kindergarten and first-grade children (intent-to-treat)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Assignment to the after-school EF/VS intervention condition improved directly assessed EF skills relative to control, controlling for school, age, sex, grade, and pre-test scores. → Brock et al. 2018

Evidence

Brock et al. 2018

Laura L. Brock, William M. Murrah, Elizabeth A. Cottone, Andrew J. Mashburn, and David W. Grissmer. (2018). An after-school intervention targeting executive function and visuospatial skills also improves classroom behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(5), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025417738057

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Intent-to-treat regression analyses of the randomized trial (N = 87) controlling for school, age, sex, grade, and pre-test scores found the intervention improved EF, with the article reporting "b ¼ .28, p < .001". No standardized effect size is printed for this coefficient.

"As hypothesized, the intervention improves directly assessed EF ( b ¼ .28, p < .001) and VS ( b ¼ .26, p < .001) skills."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.