Claims

Older adults produced more external details than younger adults only in the memory experiment, not in problem solving

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Older adults generated more external details than younger adults for memory (d = -1.04) but equivalent numbers for problem solving (d = -0.46, non-significant). → Peters 2019

Evidence

Peters 2019

Peters, S. L., Fan, C. L., & Sheldon, S. (2019). Episodic memory contributions to autobiographical memory and open-ended problem-solving specificity in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 47, 1592–1605. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00953-1

q3 · i3 · associational · r1

Follow-up ANOVA for the memory experiment found older adults generated "more external details than younger adults", "d = - 1.04"; for problem solving the difference was not significant (d = -0.46).

"more external details than younger adults ( M = 7.94, SE = 0.75; t(47) = - 3.63, p <. 0 0 1 ,d = - 1.04)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id age-external-details-memory-only
title Older adults produced more external details than younger adults only in the memory experiment, not in problem solving
description Older adults produced more external details than younger adults only in the memory experiment, not in problem solving
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — peters-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.