Claims

Older adults produce fewer internal details than younger adults during elaboration across both experiments

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Younger adults generated more internal details than older adults for memory (d = 1.43) and problem solving (d = 1.21). → Peters 2019

Evidence

Peters 2019

Peters, S. L., Fan, C. L., & Sheldon, S. (2019). Episodic memory contributions to autobiographical memory and open-ended problem-solving specificity in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 47, 1592–1605. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00953-1

q3 · i3 · associational · r1

Mixed-design ANOVA on elaboration details in the memory experiment found younger adults generated more internal details than older adults, "d = 1.43"; the problem-solving contrast was d = 1.21.

"For the memory experiment, younger adults (M =3 1 . 6 0 ,SE = 1.80) generated more internal details than older adults (M =1 8 . 7 0 ,SE =1 . 8 2 ;t(47) =4 . 9 8 ,p <. 0 0 1 ,d = 1.43)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id aging-fewer-internal-details-elaboration
title Older adults produce fewer internal details than younger adults during elaboration across both experiments
description Older adults produce fewer internal details than younger adults during elaboration across both experiments
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — peters-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.