Grouping students by age instead of grade is a viable alternative for tracking ITBS score trends, mirroring the grade-group findings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 1998 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Age groupings mirror the grade group findings, with the greatest improvements among students most directly affected by the policy. → John Q. Easton 1998
Evidence¶
John Q. Easton 1998¶
John Q. Easton, Brian Jacob, Stuart Luppescu, Melissa Roderick. (1998). Adjusting Citywide ITBS Scores for Student Retention in Grades Three, Six, and Eight. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/adjusting-citywide-itbs-scores-student-retention-grades-three-six-and-eight
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Cross-sectional comparison of mean ITBS scores by age groups (Figure 14), defined by birthdays within six months of April 15, following the practice of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The article reports the age-group trends are nearly parallel to the adjusted grade trends.
"This study also shows that grouping students by age instead of grade is a viable alternative for tracking their scores. The age groupings mirror the grade group findings, with the greatest improvements among students most directly affected by the policy."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- CPS elementary ITBS scores improved across the 1990s in both reading and math for all age groups, but trend gains flattened after 1998 — related
- Reading score trends flattened for ages 9-12 and declined at ages 9 and 12 in the grade equivalent metric by 2000 — related
- After adjustments for inclusion-rule changes, CPS elementary test scores continued to improve through 1999, with long-term math gains across all grades but slowing reading improvement at ages 9, 11, and 12 — related
- Math test scores in CPS elementary schools continued long-term improvements for all age levels through 2000 — related
- CPS learning gains were consistently higher in all grades in 1996 than in 1994, but 1999 gains declined slightly relative to 1997 in all grades except third, suggesting productivity gains may have peaked — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
age-group-reporting-viable-alternative |
title |
Grouping students by age instead of grade is a viable alternative for tracking ITBS score trends, mirroring the grade-group findings |
description |
Grouping students by age instead of grade is a viable alternative for tracking ITBS score trends, mirroring the grade-group findings |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1998 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — john-q-easton-1998 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.