Reading score trends flattened for ages 9-12 and declined at ages 9 and 12 in the grade equivalent metric by 2000¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2001 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2006: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Earlier rising reading trends for students ages 9 through 12 appear to have flattened out, and actual declines are apparent at ages 9 and 12 in the grade equivalent metric. → John Q. Easton 2001
q2 i? Positive reading trends continued for older students, ages 13 and 14. → John Q. Easton 2001 (2)
Evidence¶
John Q. Easton 2001¶
John Q. Easton, Todd Rosenkranz, Anthony S. Bryk. (2001). Annual CPS Test Trend Review, 2000: Elementary School Test Score Trends in Chicago Public Schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/annual-cps-trend-review-2000
q2 · i? · associational · r2
ITBS reading trend analysis by age group, 1992-2000. The brief states "Earlier rising trends in reading for students ages 9 through 12 appear to have flattened out" and separately reports actual declines at ages 9 and 12 in the grade equivalent metric.
"Earlier rising trends in reading for students ages 9 through 12 appear to have flattened out."
John Q. Easton 2001 (2)¶
John Q. Easton, Todd Rosenkranz, Anthony S. Bryk. (2001). Annual CPS Test Trend Review, 2000: Elementary School Test Score Trends in Chicago Public Schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/annual-cps-trend-review-2000
q2 · i? · associational · r2
The same ITBS trend analysis reports that "Positive trends in ITBS reading scores continue for older students (13 and 14 years old)", contrasting with the flattening seen at younger ages.
"Positive trends in ITBS reading scores continue for older students (13 and 14 years old)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Age and Developmental Stage — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- All six CPS age cohorts saw a slight 2001 decline in math scores of less than one month, which a Rasch-score re-analysis suggests reflects an actual drop in learning rather than test-form effects — related
- CPS elementary ITBS scores improved across the 1990s in both reading and math for all age groups, but trend gains flattened after 1998 — related
- CPS academic productivity gains peaked in 1997, with 1999 gains uniformly lower than 1997 gains at all grades — related
- A Rasch-score re-analysis corroborates slowing and in some cases declining test score trends, with nine-year-olds an exception — related
- Grouping students by age instead of grade is a viable alternative for tracking ITBS score trends, mirroring the grade-group findings — related
- After adjustments for inclusion-rule changes, CPS elementary test scores continued to improve through 1999, with long-term math gains across all grades but slowing reading improvement at ages 9, 11, and 12 — a broader claim this one bears on
- Standardized test scores change so slowly that even schools making exceptional gains may appear stagnant — related
- Achievement progress is steeper for students tested at younger ages, especially in math — related
- CPS elementary school productivity improvements stalled after 1997, with no evidence of significant productivity growth since then — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cps-reading-trends-flattened-declined-younger-ages |
title |
Reading score trends flattened for ages 9-12 and declined at ages 9 and 12 in the grade equivalent metric by 2000 |
description |
Reading score trends flattened for ages 9-12 and declined at ages 9 and 12 in the grade equivalent metric by 2000 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2001 |
recheck_by |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — john-q-easton-2001, john-q-easton-2001-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.