Claims

Older two- and three-year-olds have lower odds of failing delay-of-gratification tasks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Age was the only significant preliminary predictor of task success, with older children having lower odds of failing both tasks. → Mulder 2019

Evidence

Mulder 2019

Mulder, H., van Ravenswaaij, H., Verhagen, J., Moerbeek, M., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2019). The process of early self-control: an observational study in two- and three-year-olds. Metacognition and Learning, 14, 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09199-3

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Preliminary logistic regression of snack delay performance on age, gender, chair height, and caregiver presence (χ2(4) = 20.4, p < .001); age was the only significant predictor. For gift delay (χ2(4) = 13.8, p = .017), age was again the only significant predictor (B = −0.17, p = .012).

"Age was the only significant predictor, as older children had lower odds of failing the task (B =−0.24; SE =0.12; p < .001; 95% CI of B = −0.54 to −0.14)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id age-predicts-toddler-delay-task-success
title Older two- and three-year-olds have lower odds of failing delay-of-gratification tasks
description Older two- and three-year-olds have lower odds of failing delay-of-gratification tasks
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — mulder-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.