Older adults were slower than young adults overall on solution times, with no age difference in accuracy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Older adults' solution times (872 ms) were slower than younger adults' (771 ms), while accuracy did not differ between age groups. → Thevenot 2018
q3 i? The effect of Age on accuracy rates was not significant and did not interact with any variable. → Thevenot 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Thevenot 2018¶
Thevenot, C., Dewi, J., Bagnoud, J., Wolfer, P., Fayol, M., & Castel, C. (2018). The use of automated procedures by older adults with high arithmetic skills during addition problem solving. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
ANOVA on solution times in the sign priming experiment with matched high-skill samples (18 older, 26 young). "older adults were slower (872 ms) than younger ones (771 ms)", ηp2 = .18, with no Operation × Age interaction.
"There was an effect of Age, F(1, 42) = 8.99, MSE = 2202948.56, ηp2 = .18, p < .01, showing that older adults were slower (872 ms) than younger ones (771 ms)"
Thevenot 2018 (2)¶
Thevenot, C., Dewi, J., Bagnoud, J., Wolfer, P., Fayol, M., & Castel, C. (2018). The use of automated procedures by older adults with high arithmetic skills during addition problem solving. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Accuracy ANOVA (mean .97 correct) in the same experiment: the Age effect on correct-response rates was not significant and did not interact with any variable; no effect size was printed.
"No other effect reached significant. Noticeably, the effect of Age was not significant and did not interact with any of the variables."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Older adults' slowdown relative to young adults is far smaller for problems interpreted as procedurally solved than for retrieval-solved problems — related
- Problem type modulated solution times, with large problems slowest and +1 problems fastest in both age groups — related
- Presenting the '+' sign 150 ms before operands speeds up addition problem solving in expert older adults, replicating the effect found in young adults — related
- Older adults can think as divergently as young adults but do so at a slower rate and require more time — related
- Bayesian analyses strongly support sign priming for small addition problems in older adults but only anecdotal support for +1 problems — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
age-slowness-no-accuracy-difference |
title |
Older adults were slower than young adults overall on solution times, with no age difference in accuracy |
description |
Older adults were slower than young adults overall on solution times, with no age difference in accuracy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — thevenot-2018, thevenot-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.