Older adults' slowdown relative to young adults is far smaller for problems interpreted as procedurally solved than for retrieval-solved problems¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the null SOA condition, priming-sensitive (procedural) additions were only 34-64 ms slower in older adults, whereas +0 and tie additions showed +215 ms and +110 ms age differences. → Thevenot 2018
Evidence¶
Thevenot 2018¶
Thevenot, C., Dewi, J., Bagnoud, J., Wolfer, P., Fayol, M., & Castel, C. (2018). The use of automated procedures by older adults with high arithmetic skills during addition problem solving. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' descriptive comparison of null-SOA solution times by problem category in the discussion of the priming experiment. "difference of only 34, 64 and 59 ms for Large, Small and +1 additions" versus +215 ms and +110 ms for +0 and tie problems; no inferential test reported.
"the categories of problems that we interpret as being processed through automated procedures because they benefit from the prior presentation of the “+” sign are solved only 52 ms slower by older than younger adults in the null SOA condition (i.e., difference of only 34, 64 and 59 ms for Large, Small and +1 additions respectively) when older adults suffer more than triple the times (+162 ms) for addition problems that we interpret as being solved by retrieval (i.e., +215 ms and +110 for +0 and tie problems, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Older adults were slower than young adults overall on solution times, with no age difference in accuracy — related
- Bayesian analyses strongly support sign priming for small addition problems in older adults but only anecdotal support for +1 problems — related
- Sign priming effects in addition occur for large, small, and +1 problems but not for tie or +0 problems in older adults — related
- Problem type modulated solution times, with large problems slowest and +1 problems fastest in both age groups — related
- Presenting the '+' sign 150 ms before operands speeds up addition problem solving in expert older adults, replicating the effect found in young adults — related
- Older adults can think as divergently as young adults but do so at a slower rate and require more time — related
- Young adults outperformed old adults in all goal conditions, but the age difference was much smaller under nonspecific goals
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
differential-aging-cost-procedure-vs-retrieval |
title |
Older adults' slowdown relative to young adults is far smaller for problems interpreted as procedurally solved than for retrieval-solved problems |
description |
Older adults' slowdown relative to young adults is far smaller for problems interpreted as procedurally solved than for retrieval-solved problems |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — thevenot-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.