Claims

Punishment for unfair play depends on perceived agency and responsibility, not only on monetary outcome

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a study where some players freely chose donations and others followed written instructions, only those responsible for their actions were punished despite equal monetary loss. → Frith Chris D 2012

Evidence

Frith Chris D 2012

Frith Chris D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0123

q2 · i? · review · r?

A study by Singer (as reviewed here) within an altruistic-punishment paradigm in which some players freely decided donations and others followed written instructions. The review reports that non-responsible players escaped punishment despite identical monetary loss.

"Even though the monetary loss was the same, the people who were not responsible for their actions were not punished."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id agency-responsibility-altruistic-punishment
title Punishment for unfair play depends on perceived agency and responsibility, not only on monetary outcome
description Punishment for unfair play depends on perceived agency and responsibility, not only on monetary outcome
status review
evidence_strength moderate
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — frith-chris-d-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.