Claims

A randomized controlled trial with 86 K-12 students found a significant gain in self-regulated-learning strategy use from agentic coaching systems

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-17 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A randomized controlled trial with 86 K-12 students reported a significant SRL-strategy gain (p < 0.05) from agentic coaching systems that prompt planning, monitoring and reflection. → Kostopoulos 2025

Evidence

Kostopoulos 2025

Kostopoulos, G., Gkamas, V., Rigou, M., & Kotsiantis, S. (2025). Agentic AI in Education: State of the Art and Future Directions. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3620473

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports a randomized controlled trial with 86 K-12 students evaluating agentic coaching systems fostering self-regulated learning, finding a "significant SRL-strategy gain, p < 0.05". Only a p-value is printed and no effect size, so the magnitude is unknown and impact is coded i?; the gain itself is reported as significant.

"Controlled evaluations show positive effects on metacognitive strategy use and persistence (Zimmerman [11]; Panadero [15] — randomized controlled trial, N = 86 K-12 students, significant SRL-strategy gain, p < 0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id agentic-srl-coaching-rct-86-significant-strategy-gain
title A randomized controlled trial with 86 K-12 students found a significant gain in self-regulated-learning strategy use from agentic coaching systems
description A randomized controlled trial with 86 K-12 students found a significant gain in self-regulated-learning strategy use from agentic coaching systems
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-17
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kostopoulos-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.