Claims

Most academic global surgery programs are delivered in person, though hybrid and online formats are also present

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 77 programs, 57 were delivered entirely in person, 8 allowed choice between in-person and virtual attendance, 7 required combined in-person and virtual components, and 3 were fully online. → Zolo Yvan 2026

Evidence

Zolo Yvan 2026

Zolo Yvan, Mulwafu Wakisa, David Dalle Ulrich, Maswime Salome. (2026). Academic Competencies in Academic Global Surgery: A Scoping Review. ANZ Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70384

q2 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive synthesis of delivery modes across the 77 included programs. The review reports 57 programs delivered entirely in person, 8 with participant choice of modality, 7 with required combined components, and 3 fully online.

"Across the 77 academic global surgery programs included in this review, 57 were delivered entirely in person. Eight programs allowed participants to choose between in-person and virtual attendance. Seven programs required a combination of both in-person and virtual components as part of their structure. Three programs were delivered fully online."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.