Higher education students' interactions with an AI automated feedback tool can support the development of their feedback literacy capabilities¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a university-wide pilot, student interactions with an AI automated feedback tool were interpreted as affording development of students' feedback literacy capabilities. → Laura Tubino 2022
Evidence¶
Laura Tubino 2022¶
Laura Tubino, Chie Adachi. (2022). Developing feedback literacy capabilities through an AI automated feedback tool. ASCILITE 2022 Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2022.39
q2 · i? · design · r1
A reflective report of a University-wide T&L pilot project with an AI tool for automated feedback; the authors frame a discourse on AI use "to promote and further develop students' feedback literacy capabilities". No effect sizes or test statistics are printed; the support is interpretive rather than experimental.
"This paper reports the interactions of higher education students with an AI automated feedback tool and discusses its affordances in relation to the development of students' feedback literacy capabilities."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- ChatGPT was the most widely adopted AI platform in undergraduate higher education studies, with applications clustering around assessment automation and personalized learning support — related
- Gains from automated scoring concentrated in linguistic accuracy and logical coherence but were absent in information fidelity and delivery fluency — related
- The article reports observational patterns that AI assistance can improve short-term performance while reducing cognitive engagement and independent capability — related
- Reviewed AI literature portrays AI as having transformative capacity to reshape educational methodologies, with a need for balancing guidelines — a broader claim this one bears on
- Universities pair academic-integrity guidance with AI literacy and student readiness supports, treating literacy as strategic rather than punitive — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-feedback-tool-supports-feedback-literacy-development |
title |
Higher education students' interactions with an AI automated feedback tool can support the development of their feedback literacy capabilities |
description |
Higher education students' interactions with an AI automated feedback tool can support the development of their feedback literacy capabilities |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laura-tubino-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.