Claims

AI systems are non-neutral socio-technical artifacts embedding cultural assumptions and power relations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? AI systems embed cultural assumptions, economic and political interests, and power relations, mediating human activity in distinctive ways. → Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli 2026

Evidence

Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli 2026

Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli, Henriikka Vartiainen, Matt Bower, Martina Ronci, Chris Shelton, Kathryn MacCallum, Jihyun Lee, Mary Webb, Yousra Cthouki, David Smith. (2026). Situated AI Ethics: A Cultural-Historical and Ecological Framework for Education. Computers and Education Open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100368

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Theoretical assertion in the discussion, attributed by the article to Coeckelbergh, Crawford and Hopwood. The article illustrates that when under-resourced schools adopt ChatGPT as a standard tool, 'epistemic injustice may arise through the marginalisation of minority languages and perspectives'.

"AI systems are never neutral tools (Coeckelberg, 2023); they embed cultural assumptions, economic and political interests, and power relations (Crawford, 2021), mediating human activity in distinctive ways (Hopwood, 2023)."

Studies bearing on this claim

Do the assumptions built into an AI tool carry into what learners write and the feedback they get, and does configuring the tool change that? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 9 narrower claims that bear on it: 6 distinct studies (2 causal, 2 qualitative, 1 theoretical, 1 review), q1–q2, 1 of 6 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Juliana Elisa Raffaghelli 2026 q1 · theoretical · r2 i? this claim
Ariyan Hossain 2026 q2 · causal · r2 i3; i2; i? Students assisted by a gender-biased LLM produce career-plan essays with a significantly l (supports); Biased LLM assistance increases students' gender-stereotypic occupational recommendations: (supports); Students exposed to the biased LLM showed no awareness of its influence, reporting lower p (supports); Bias transfer is asymmetric: prompt condition affects agency in female-target essays but n (qualifies); A neutrally configured LLM assistant produced the lowest rate of gender-stereotypic occupa (qualifies)
Tan et al. 2026 q2 · causal · r2 i? Race prompts elicit culturally stereotyped feedback: Black, Hispanic, and Asian students a (supports)
Jean-Pierre Briot 2026 q2 · review · r1 i? AI-assisted outputs are more similar to each other than purely human-authored ones, indica (supports)
Zhaozhe Wang 2025 q2 · qualitative · r2 i? Despite a student's claims of purely human authorial agency, posthumanist analysis of his (supports)
Raigul Zheldibayeva 2026 q2 · qualitative · r3 i? Interactive dialogue with the AI tool, available only in some sites, promoted deeper engag (qualifies)

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ai-non-neutral-embeds-power-relations
title AI systems are non-neutral socio-technical artifacts embedding cultural assumptions and power relations
description AI systems are non-neutral socio-technical artifacts embedding cultural assumptions and power relations
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — juliana-elisa-raffaghelli-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.