AI proficiency moderates the association between course development satisfaction and academic adjustment, which is stronger among students with higher AI proficiency¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The positive association between course development satisfaction and academic adjustment is significantly stronger among students with higher AI proficiency (interaction B = 0.12, p = 0.003). → Zhang J and Yin Y 2026
Evidence¶
Zhang J and Yin Y 2026¶
Zhang J and Yin Y (2026). A study on AI-enabled course development, AI proficiency, and first-year students' academic and psychological adjustment. Front. Psychol. 17:1909803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1909803
q2 · i? · associational · r2
A simple moderation model (PROCESS Model 1) estimated in the 551-student cross-sectional survey tested H5. The article reports the interaction "was positive and statistically significant (B = 0.12, SE = 0.04, t = 3.01, p = 0.003)"; main effects of course development satisfaction (B = 0.34) and AI proficiency (B = 0.27) were also significant.
"The interaction term between course development satisfaction and AI proficiency was positive and statistically significant (B = 0.12, SE = 0.04, t = 3.01, p = 0.003), indicating that the positive association between course development satisfaction and academic adjustment was significantly stronger among students with higher AI proficiency"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- AI usage pressure attenuates the indirect association of course development satisfaction with psychological adjustment through AI proficiency (moderated mediation index = −0.051) — related
- Course development satisfaction is positively associated with first-year students' emotional management, stress coping, and academic adjustment in cross-sectional self-report data — related
- AI proficiency partially mediates the association between course development satisfaction and self-reported psychological adjustment (indirect effect = 0.124) — related
- AI proficiency is positively associated with self-reported psychological adjustment after controlling for course development satisfaction — related
- Course development satisfaction and AI proficiency add incremental explained variance beyond demographics, with the largest contribution to academic adjustment (R2 = 0.240) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-proficiency-moderates-course-satisfaction-academic-adjustment |
title |
AI proficiency moderates the association between course development satisfaction and academic adjustment, which is stronger among students with higher AI proficiency |
description |
AI proficiency moderates the association between course development satisfaction and academic adjustment, which is stronger among students with higher AI proficiency |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zhang-j-and-yin-y-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.