AI usage pressure attenuates the indirect association of course development satisfaction with psychological adjustment through AI proficiency (moderated mediation index = −0.051)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The positive association between AI proficiency and psychological adjustment weakens as AI usage pressure rises, becoming non-significant at 1 SD above the mean (simple slope B = 0.20, p = 0.052). → Zhang J and Yin Y 2026
Evidence¶
Zhang J and Yin Y 2026¶
Zhang J and Yin Y (2026). A study on AI-enabled course development, AI proficiency, and first-year students' academic and psychological adjustment. Front. Psychol. 17:1909803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1909803
q2 · i? · associational · r2
A moderated mediation model (PROCESS Model 14) in the 551-student survey showed the proficiency–adjustment interaction with AI usage pressure was negative and significant (B = −0.11, p = 0.004). Conditional indirect effects fell from 0.161 (low pressure) to 0.088 (high pressure); the article reports "The moderated mediation index was −0.051 (95% CI [−0.095, −0.017]), which does not include zero."
"The moderated mediation index was −0.051 (95% CI [−0.095, −0.017]), which does not include zero, supporting H6: the indirect association between course development satisfaction and self-reported psychological adjustment through AI proficiency was significantly attenuated by AI usage pressure"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- AI proficiency moderates the association between course development satisfaction and academic adjustment, which is stronger among students with higher AI proficiency — related
- AI proficiency partially mediates the association between course development satisfaction and self-reported psychological adjustment (indirect effect = 0.124) — related
- AI proficiency is positively associated with self-reported psychological adjustment after controlling for course development satisfaction — related
- Course development satisfaction and AI proficiency add incremental explained variance beyond demographics, with the largest contribution to academic adjustment (R2 = 0.240) — related
- First-year students report coexisting high approval of AI-enabled courses and high self-reported psychological strain, with strain indicators endorsed by more than two-thirds of the sample — related
- Course development satisfaction is positively associated with first-year students' emotional management, stress coping, and academic adjustment in cross-sectional self-report data — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ai-usage-pressure-attenuates-indirect-association |
title |
AI usage pressure attenuates the indirect association of course development satisfaction with psychological adjustment through AI proficiency (moderated mediation index = −0.051) |
description |
AI usage pressure attenuates the indirect association of course development satisfaction with psychological adjustment through AI proficiency (moderated mediation index = −0.051) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zhang-j-and-yin-y-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.