Claims

In the Albright RCT, knowledge, skills, and likelihood to screen increased significantly from pre- to post-test and versus control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the Albright et al. RCT (227 nurses, nurse practitioners and doctors), knowledge and skills and likelihood to screen and manage mental health issues increased significantly from pre- to post-test and relative to the control group. → Morvannou Adèle 2024

Evidence

Morvannou Adèle 2024

Morvannou Adèle, Allami Youssef, Jobin Emilie Y. (2024). Virtual patients with substance use disorders in healthcare professional education: a scoping review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78344

q3 · i? · review · r2

RCT with 227 nurses, nurse practitioners and doctors using an online simulation with emotionally responsive virtual patients to learn motivational interviewing strategies; the table reports a "Significant increase between pre- and post-test***" for knowledge and skills and likelihood to screen, and significant treatment-control differences (p < .001).

"To identify the impact of an online simulation where learners practice role-playing with emotionally responsive virtual patients to learn MI strategies to better manage SBIRT conversations"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.