Claims

Simulation-based education consistently improved nurses' confidence in delirium recognition and assessment across included studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Confidence in delirium recognition and assessment improved significantly across studies, including confidence in using the CAM-ICU on four of five items in one study and increased observer-rated performance and self-confidence in another. → EL Hussein Mohamed Toufic 2026

Evidence

EL Hussein Mohamed Toufic 2026

EL Hussein Mohamed Toufic, Sheehan Dawson S., Hirst Sandra. (2026). Simulation‐Based Education to Support Nurses' Critical Thinking in Delirium Recognition: A Scoping Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70640

q2 · i? · review · r2

This narrative synthesis spans studies including a single-group pretest–post test of 34 critical-care RNs using standardized-patient delirium scenarios with CAM-ICU practice, and a quasi-experimental waitlist-control crossover study of 48 new graduate nurses with SP scenarios. The review reports "significant improvements in four of five confidence domains" and "increased observer-rated performance and self-confidence"; no effect sizes are printed.

"Smith et al. (2017) demonstrated significant improvements in four of five confidence domains while Roh et al. (2024) similarly observed increased observer-rated performance and self-confidence."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.