The response article reviews Philipsen et al.'s (2019) systematic meta-aggregative review of teacher professional development for online and blended learning from a practice perspective¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The response takes a practice perspective on the Philipsen et al. (2019) meta-aggregative review of teacher professional development for online and blended learning. → An 2021
Evidence¶
An 2021¶
An, Y. (2021). A response to an article entitled “Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review”. Education Tech Research Dev, 69, 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09844-8
q1 · i? · review · r?
The response article's abstract states its purpose: it reviews the Philipsen et al. (2019) meta-aggregative review "from a practice perspective." No data are reported; this is the article's own framing statement.
"This response reviews the article entitled “Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review” (Philipsen in Educ Technol Res Dev 67:1145–1174, 2019) from a practice perspective."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The response discusses limitations of the Philipsen et al. (2019) review and suggestions for future research — related
- The response summarizes the key findings of the Philipsen et al. (2019) meta-aggregative review — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
an-2021-response-reviews-philipsen-pd-review-practice-perspective |
title |
The response article reviews Philipsen et al.'s (2019) systematic meta-aggregative review of teacher professional development for online and blended learning from a practice perspective |
description |
The response article reviews Philipsen et al.'s (2019) systematic meta-aggregative review of teacher professional development for online and blended learning from a practice perspective |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — an-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.