Analogical reasoning and perspective taking are the strongest predictors of knowledge integration, followed by tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and reflexivity¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the simultaneous regression model, analogical reasoning (b = 0.29) and perspective taking (b = 0.26) showed the highest predictability, ahead of tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty (b = 0.21) and reflexivity (b = 0.12). → Olga Vogel 2024

Evidence¶

Olga Vogel 2024¶

Olga Vogel, Marcel Hunecke. (2024). Fostering knowledge integration through individual competencies: the impacts of perspective taking, reflexivity, analogical reasoning and tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09653-5

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Same regression model as H1 (Model 1, Table 4). The article prints the ordering of regression coefficients: "Analogical reasoning (b = 0.29) and perspective taking (b = 0.26) demonstrated the highest predictability". The b values are regression coefficients, not standardized effect sizes, so impact is null.

"Analogical reasoning (b = 0.29) and perspective taking (b = 0.26) demonstrated the highest predictability in the regression model, followed by tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty (b = 0.21) and reflexivity (b = 0.12)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Social Awareness and Relationship Skills — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Reflexivity, perspective taking, analogical reasoning, and tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty each positively relate to knowledge integration in inter- and transdisciplinary work — a broader claim this one bears on
• The competency–knowledge integration relationships differ between scientific and economic samples: reflexivity is significant only in the scientific sample, while tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and perspective taking are significant only in the economic sample — related
• Expertise positively predicts knowledge integration, and the four competencies remain positively related to knowledge integration at different levels of expertise — related
• Experts do not exhibit higher levels of reflexivity than novices, consistent with reflexivity as a meta-cognitive competence — related