The competency–knowledge integration relationships differ between scientific and economic samples: reflexivity is significant only in the scientific sample, while tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and perspective taking are significant only in the economic sample¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the scientific sample the impact of reflexivity on knowledge integration was significant, but not the effects of tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and perspective taking; in the economic sample the reverse pattern held. → Olga Vogel 2024 q2 i? The moderation effects on the regression paths and the overall interaction effect were not significant, so Hypothesis 2 of equal relevance in both contexts could not be confirmed. → Olga Vogel 2024 (2)

Evidence¶

Olga Vogel 2024¶

Olga Vogel, Marcel Hunecke. (2024). Fostering knowledge integration through individual competencies: the impacts of perspective taking, reflexivity, analogical reasoning and tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09653-5

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Moderated regression with group as moderator (R 2 = 0.34, F(9,246) = 15.96, p < 0.001) comparing the scientific (N = 152) and economic (N = 104) samples via simple slopes. Path coefficients "differed between groups" as the article reports. No effect sizes are printed for the group-specific paths.

"In the scientific sample, the impact of reflexivity was also significant, but not the effects of tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and perspective taking. Contrarily, in the economic sample, the effects of tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and perspective taking on knowledge integration were significant, whereas the impact of reflexivity was not observed."

Olga Vogel 2024 (2)¶

Olga Vogel, Marcel Hunecke. (2024). Fostering knowledge integration through individual competencies: the impacts of perspective taking, reflexivity, analogical reasoning and tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09653-5

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The same moderated regression analysis reports a non-significant overall interaction (p = 0.74) and non-significant moderation of each path (all p ≥ 0.23). The article states Hypothesis 2 "could not be confirmed"; equivalence between contexts was not tested, so this null is reported as detected-no-moderation.

"Neither the interaction effect on the overall model (b = − 0.19, SE = 0.59, t = − 0.33, p = 0.74, 95% CI [− 0.00, 0.29]) nor the moderation effects on the regression paths"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Social Awareness and Relationship Skills — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Analogical reasoning and perspective taking are the strongest predictors of knowledge integration, followed by tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty and reflexivity — related
• Reflexivity, perspective taking, analogical reasoning, and tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty each positively relate to knowledge integration in inter- and transdisciplinary work — a broader claim this one bears on
• Experts do not exhibit higher levels of reflexivity than novices, consistent with reflexivity as a meta-cognitive competence — related