Claims

The Analogues test ranked first among the twelve originality tests in agreement with the group's amalgamated rank-order.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1916 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among the twelve trials, the Analogues test ranked first as a probable measure of originality. → Chassell 1916

Evidence

Chassell 1916

Chassell, L. M. (1916). Tests for originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(6), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070310

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Ranking study of 100 students tested with twelve originality tests; final group rank was the median of each student's twelve ranks. The comment section reports that "Analogues ranks first among the tests," while noting the sixth analogue was the most difficult item.

"Analogues ranks first among the tests. It might have been even more valuable, however, if the "picture writing" analogue (No. 6), which was by far the most difficult, had been replaced by one more nearly like the others,"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id analogues-first-among-originality-tests
title The Analogues test ranked first among the twelve originality tests in agreement with the group's amalgamated rank-order.
description The Analogues test ranked first among the twelve originality tests in agreement with the group's amalgamated rank-order.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1916
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chassell-1916

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.