Claims

An inventor of international reputation ranked within the first half but showed no exceptional originality on the tests.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 1916 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? One internationally renowned inventor scored within the first half of the 100-student group but not exceptionally high. → Chassell 1916

Evidence

Chassell 1916

Chassell, L. M. (1916). Tests for originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(6), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070310

q1 · i? · associational · r1

Single-case comparison in which one inventor of international reputation took the same twelve tests as the 100 students. The article reports he "ranked within the first half of the group" without an exceptional record.

"it is interesting to note that the inventor did not give exceptional evidence of originality in his response to the tests, though he ranked within the first half of the group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id inventor-not-exceptional-on-originality-tests
title An inventor of international reputation ranked within the first half but showed no exceptional originality on the tests.
description An inventor of international reputation ranked within the first half but showed no exceptional originality on the tests.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1916
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chassell-1916

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.