ANCOVA on final test scores showed a significant difference favoring the simulation-based group, with a printed effect size of 0.90¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i3 Controlling for pre-test scores, final test scores differed significantly between the experimental and control groups (F(1,52) = 445.90, p < 0.05, effect size 0.90). → Timur Koparan 2015

Evidence¶

Timur Koparan 2015¶

Timur Koparan, Gül Kaleli Yılmaz. (2015). The Effect of Simulation-based Learning on Prospective Teachers’ Inference Skills in Teaching Probability. Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(11). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031101

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

ANCOVA on final test scores of 55 prospective teachers with pre-test as covariate, reported in Table 5 with F = 445.90, Sig. 0.00 and printed effect size 0.90 for the Method factor. The article links the experimental group's achievement development to simulation-based learning.

"a statistically significant difference was found between final test scores when the pre- test scores of the prospective teachers in the experimental group in which the simulation based learning was used and the control group in which the traditional teaching was used, were taken under control 05,0,907,445)521( <=− pF ."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Simulation-based probability teaching significantly improved experimental-group prospective teachers' test scores from pre-test to final test — related
• Playing a web-based simulation game produces significantly higher deep-learning strategy use than no-game conventional teaching, controlling for pre-game strategy use — related
• The context-based instructional design produced higher post-test cognitive achievement than the existing curriculum when prior readiness was controlled — related