Claims

ANCOVA on post-test attitude scores with KCSE covariates found a statistically significant overall difference among the three groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANCOVA of post-test attitude scores, adjusting for KCSE Mathematics, English and Physics points, showed statistically significant differences among groups E, C1 and C2 (F = 3.115, df = 2/99, Sig. = 0.049). → Daniel M. Getuno 2015

Evidence

Daniel M. Getuno 2015

Daniel M. Getuno, Joel K. Kiboss, Johnson M. Changeiywo, & Leo B. Ogola. (2015). Effects of an E-Learning Module on Students' Attitudes in an Electronics Class. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086475

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Omnibus ANCOVA on post-test attitude scores for the three groups, with students' average KCSE scores in Mathematics, English and Physics as covariates (evaluated at 7.0609 points). The contrast was significant, with "F (.049, 2, 99) = 3.115"; no effect size is printed.

"The results reveal that there were statistically si gnificant differences in post-test scores for stude nts' attitudes where, F (.049, 2, 99) = 3.115 > Critical F (.05, 2, 99) = 3.0718."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.