Claims

Groups E and C1 were homogeneous in entry attitudes, with no significant pre-test difference

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? An independent-samples t-test found no statistically significant difference in pre-test attitude means between groups E and C1 (t = 1.353, df = 69, p = 0.181). → Daniel M. Getuno 2015

Evidence

Daniel M. Getuno 2015

Daniel M. Getuno, Joel K. Kiboss, Johnson M. Changeiywo, & Leo B. Ogola. (2015). Effects of an E-Learning Module on Students' Attitudes in an Electronics Class. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086475

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Entry-behaviour check: t-test on pre-test SAQ scores for E (N = 37, mean 97.0811, SD 18.1863) and C1 (N = 34, mean 102.2353, SD 13.30996); calculated t = 1.353, p = 0.18, not significant at 0.05. The groups were "homogeneous at the beginning"; no effect size is printed.

"The results of the t- test for students' attitudes as shown in Table 2 reveal that there were no stati stically significant differences in the pre-test means of th e two groups. This implies that the two groups were homogeneous at the beginning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.