Students' studio art production scores improved across lesson 1, lesson 7 and lesson 14 during the module¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Mean studio art production scores rose from 23.82 (lesson 1) to 39.97 (lesson 7) to 56.70 (lesson 14). → Subramaniam et al. 2016

Evidence¶

Subramaniam et al. 2016¶

Maithreyi Subramaniam, Ruzaika Omar Basaree, Jaffri Hanafi, Abu Talib Putih. (2016). Combining Anderson's Model in the Teaching of Art Appreciation for Undergraduate Students. li-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 3(13), October - December 2016. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133234

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive findings for the same 33 students (Table 2), rated by three art-educator raters with inter-rater reliability .831 to .877; no inferential test of the improvement is printed.

"In the lesson 1, the mean score is 23.82 (SD=8.97), but there is an improvement in lesson 7 with a mean score of 39.97 (SD=9.01). In the lesson 14, the mean score is 56.70 (SD=7.20) indicates students performed better in their final studio art production."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Undergraduate students' art appreciation test scores improved progressively across pre-test, middle-test and post-test under an Anderson's-model teaching module — related
• Test scores and studio art production scores showed moderate positive correlations at all three measurement points — related
• Students excelled in perceptual analysis, reaction and personal interpretation but performed weakest in synthesis across the five Anderson dimensions — related