Claims

Undergraduate students' art appreciation test scores improved progressively across pre-test, middle-test and post-test under an Anderson's-model teaching module

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Mean test scores rose from 28.82 (pre-test) to 43.56 (middle-test) to 61.12 (post-test) for the 33 students. → Subramaniam et al. 2016

Evidence

Subramaniam et al. 2016

Maithreyi Subramaniam, Ruzaika Omar Basaree, Jaffri Hanafi, Abu Talib Putih. (2016). Combining Anderson's Model in the Teaching of Art Appreciation for Undergraduate Students. li-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 3(13), October - December 2016. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133234

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Single-group interrupted time-series study of 33 students in creative communication design 3; Table 1 reports descriptive means and standard deviations for the three tests, with no inferential test statistic printed for the gain.

"In the pre-test, the mean score is 28.82 (SD=10.55), but there is an improvement in the middle test with a mean score of 43.56 (SD=10.02). In the post-test, the mean score is 61.12 (SD=8.46) indicates students have performed better in their final test."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.