Claims

ANGIO Mentor was the most highly validated and effective vascular simulator and the only simulator to achieve an LoE of 5/5

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANGIO Mentor, a high-fidelity VR endovascular simulator, was validated by twelve studies for angioplasty and stenting and five for EVAR, and achieved LoE 5/5 because proficiency was retained up to 3 months alongside improved patient outcomes and operative performance. → Haiser Alexander 2022

Evidence

Haiser Alexander 2022

Haiser Alexander, Aydin Abdullatif, Kunduzi Basir, Ahmed Kamran, Dasgupta Prokar. (2022). A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Training in Vascular Surgery. The Journal of Surgical Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.009

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of validation studies for ANGIO Mentor in angioplasty and stenting. The review reports the simulator differentiated performance between 32 surgical trainees, 20 vascular surgeons and 29 medical students, and that "proficiency levels were retained up to 3 mo" in the Maertens randomized controlled trial.

"Maertens et al. was awarded an LoE of 5/5 as proficiency levels were retained up to 3 mo, alongside an improvement in patient outcomes and better operative performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.