Nontechnical-skills simulation of ruptured AAA with the Resusci Anne Simulator directly improved patient outcomes, reducing door-to-occlusion time, door-to-needle time, and 30-day mortality (LoE 4/5)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Introducing a simulated rAAA scenario using the Resusci Anne Simulator was followed by reduced door-to-occlusion time, door-to-needle time, and reduced 30-day mortality, earning an LoE of 4/5 for direct patient-outcome change. → Haiser Alexander 2022
Evidence¶
Haiser Alexander 2022¶
Haiser Alexander, Aydin Abdullatif, Kunduzi Basir, Ahmed Kamran, Dasgupta Prokar. (2022). A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Training in Vascular Surgery. The Journal of Surgical Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.009
q2 · i? · review · r3
Review narrative of one NTS validation study (Aho et al.) simulating ruptured AAA with the Resusci Anne Simulator; content validity was rated only 1/2 because assessment methods were "poorly defined". The review reports the patient-outcome changes as an LoE 4/5 finding.
"There was a direct change to patient outcomes after the simulation scenario was introduced, including reduced door to occlusion time, door to needle time, and reduced 30-d mortality (LoE = 4/5)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A systematic review identified 76 eligible articles validating 34 vascular surgery simulators and training courses for open and endovascular procedures — a broader claim this one bears on
- ANGIO Mentor was the most highly validated and effective vascular simulator and the only simulator to achieve an LoE of 5/5 — related
- Only seven studies of vascular surgery simulation achieved a level of effectiveness greater than 3/5, with the majority scoring LoE 1-2/5 — a broader claim this one bears on
- Simulation-based education studies in pediatric and neonatal critical care more consistently report system-level process improvements (Level 4a) than significant direct patient-level outcome improvements (Level 4b) — related
- The review suggests current observational evidence may overestimate simulation's impact, since more rigorous cluster-RCTs showed only time-limited mortality reductions or nonsignificant results — related
- Frequent brief on-site Helping Babies Breathe simulation training was associated with a significant decrease in 24-hour neonatal mortality in a Tanzanian before–after study — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.