Standardising aseptic technique with the ANTT Clinical Practice Framework increased staff mean compliance with hand hygiene, glove use, key-part protection, and aseptic field management, as reported by Clare and Rowley¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Clare and Rowley demonstrated that standardising aseptic technique for invasive IV procedures using the ANTT-CPF increased staff mean compliance across several practices, with P ≤ 0.001. → Hegarty Josephine 2019

Evidence¶

Hegarty Josephine 2019¶

Hegarty Josephine, Howson Victoria, Wills Teresa, Creedon Sile A., Mc Cluskey Pat, Lane Aoife, Connolly Aine, Walshe Nuala, Noonan Brendan, Guidera Fiona, Gallagher Anthony G, Murphy Siobhan. (2019). Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13072

q1 · i? · design · r3

Second-hand finding reported in the article's discussion, attributed to Clare and Rowley: standardising aseptic technique via the ANTT-CPF "increased staff mean compliance" with hand hygiene, glove use, key-part protection, non-touch technique, key-part cleaning, and aseptic field management (P ≤ 0.001). The review-like attribution is reported as the source states it; the underlying study design was not read.

"Clare and Rowley40 demonstrated that standardising aseptic technique for invasive IV procedures using the ANTT—Clinical Practice Framework (CPF), increased staff mean compliance with hand hygiene, glove use, key‐part protection, use of a non‐touch technique, key‐part cleaning, and aseptic field management (P ≤ 0.001)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• An iterative six-stage development process culminating in a Delphi panel produced a validated ANTT wound-dressing observational metric with three phases, 31 steps, 18 errors, and 27 sentinel errors
• Iterative video-based task analysis of 14 wound-dressing recordings, with repeated independent scoring, produced step and error metrics with inter-rater reliability of at least 0.85