Iterative video-based task analysis of 14 wound-dressing recordings, with repeated independent scoring, produced step and error metrics with inter-rater reliability of at least 0.85¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Repeated independent viewing, scoring, and revision of the metrics continued until consistent inter-rater reliability of 0.85 or higher was achieved. → Hegarty Josephine 2019

Evidence¶

Hegarty Josephine 2019¶

Hegarty Josephine, Howson Victoria, Wills Teresa, Creedon Sile A., Mc Cluskey Pat, Lane Aoife, Connolly Aine, Walshe Nuala, Noonan Brendan, Guidera Fiona, Gallagher Anthony G, Murphy Siobhan. (2019). Acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure: Description of the steps involved in the development and validation of an observational metric. International Wound Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13072

q2 · i? · design · r3

Video analysis phase in which two team members independently watched recordings in silence up to three times before scoring agreement. Reliability was expressed by Cohen's Kappa, with κ scores ≥0.85 considered appropriate for this study.

"The process of independent viewing, scoring, and revising the step and error metrics was continued until the metrics group was satisfied that the metric accurately characterised the procedural steps of an acute surgical wound‐dressing procedure with a consistent inter‐rater reliability ≥0.85."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Standardising aseptic technique with the ANTT Clinical Practice Framework increased staff mean compliance with hand hygiene, glove use, key-part protection, and aseptic field management, as reported by Clare and Rowley
• An iterative six-stage development process culminating in a Delphi panel produced a validated ANTT wound-dressing observational metric with three phases, 31 steps, 18 errors, and 27 sentinel errors — a broader claim this one bears on