Claims

The anxiety–achievement correlation varies across types of language achievement measures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-17 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Moderator analyses revealed effect sizes vary across different types of language achievement measures. → Yasser Teimouri 2019

Evidence

Yasser Teimouri 2019

Yasser Teimouri, Julia Goetze, and Luke Plonsky. (2019). SECOND LANGUAGE ANXIETY AND ACHIEVEMENT: A META-ANALYSIS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 41, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000311

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analytic moderator analyses of the 216 correlations found heterogeneity "across different types of language achievement measures, educational levels, target languages, and anxiety types." No subgroup effect sizes are printed in the available text.

"Moderator analyses revealed effects sizes to vary across different types of language achievement measures, educational levels, target languages, and anxiety types."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id anxiety-achievement-varies-by-achievement-measure-type
title The anxiety–achievement correlation varies across types of language achievement measures
description The anxiety–achievement correlation varies across types of language achievement measures
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
source_checked 2026-10-17
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yasser-teimouri-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.