Claims

Anxiety shows no significant overall association with political learning in either cross-sectional or experimental designs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 Anxiety is not significantly associated with political learning in cross-sectional designs (r = 0.03). → Elisabeth Graf 2024 q3 i0 Anxiety is not significantly associated with political learning in experimental designs (r = 0.06). → Elisabeth Graf 2024 (2)

Evidence

Elisabeth Graf 2024

Elisabeth Graf, Johanna L. Donath, Elouise Botes, Martin Voracek, Thomas Goetz. (2024). The Associations Between Discrete Emotions and Political Learning: A Cross-Disciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09893-y

q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2

Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies (k = 19, N = 45 effect sizes) on anxiety and political learning, finding no significant overall association; equivalence was not tested.

"The model on anxiety did not reveal a significant overall association between anxiety and learning (r = 0.03, 95% CI [− 0.02, 0.07])"

Elisabeth Graf 2024 (2)

Elisabeth Graf, Johanna L. Donath, Elouise Botes, Martin Voracek, Thomas Goetz. (2024). The Associations Between Discrete Emotions and Political Learning: A Cross-Disciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09893-y

q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2

Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis of experimental studies (k = 16, N = 45 effect sizes) on anxiety and political learning, finding no significant association; equivalence was not tested.

"Regarding discrete emotions, no significant association could be found for anxiety (r = 0.06, 95% CI [− 0.04, 0.15])"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id anxiety-no-significant-association-political-learning
title Anxiety shows no significant overall association with political learning in either cross-sectional or experimental designs
description Anxiety shows no significant overall association with political learning in either cross-sectional or experimental designs
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — elisabeth-graf-2024, elisabeth-graf-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.