Anxiety shows no significant overall association with political learning in either cross-sectional or experimental designs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 Anxiety is not significantly associated with political learning in cross-sectional designs (r = 0.03). → Elisabeth Graf 2024
q3 i0 Anxiety is not significantly associated with political learning in experimental designs (r = 0.06). → Elisabeth Graf 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Elisabeth Graf 2024¶
Elisabeth Graf, Johanna L. Donath, Elouise Botes, Martin Voracek, Thomas Goetz. (2024). The Associations Between Discrete Emotions and Political Learning: A Cross-Disciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09893-y
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2
Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies (k = 19, N = 45 effect sizes) on anxiety and political learning, finding no significant overall association; equivalence was not tested.
"The model on anxiety did not reveal a significant overall association between anxiety and learning (r = 0.03, 95% CI [− 0.02, 0.07])"
Elisabeth Graf 2024 (2)¶
Elisabeth Graf, Johanna L. Donath, Elouise Botes, Martin Voracek, Thomas Goetz. (2024). The Associations Between Discrete Emotions and Political Learning: A Cross-Disciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09893-y
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r2
Multilevel random-effects meta-analysis of experimental studies (k = 16, N = 45 effect sizes) on anxiety and political learning, finding no significant association; equivalence was not tested.
"Regarding discrete emotions, no significant association could be found for anxiety (r = 0.06, 95% CI [− 0.04, 0.15])"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Anger shows a small positive association with political learning in both cross-sectional and experimental designs — related
- Positive-activating emotions show a small positive association with political learning in cross-sectional designs, but not in experimental designs — related
- Negative-activating emotions show small positive associations with political learning in both cross-sectional and experimental designs — related
- Negative-deactivating emotions show no association with political learning, but the evidence base is very small — related
- Enthusiasm shows a small positive association with political learning in cross-sectional designs but no association in experimental designs — related
- Funnel-plot asymmetry indicates small-study effects for some emotion–learning models — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
anxiety-no-significant-association-political-learning |
title |
Anxiety shows no significant overall association with political learning in either cross-sectional or experimental designs |
description |
Anxiety shows no significant overall association with political learning in either cross-sectional or experimental designs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — elisabeth-graf-2024, elisabeth-graf-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.