Claims

Agent appearance (iconic vs realistic) shows no significant difference in retention, transfer, or interest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Moreno et al. (2001) found no significant difference between an iconic agent and a full expressive video-image agent on retention, transfer of learning, and participants' interest. → Woo 2009

Evidence

Woo 2009

Woo, H.L. (2009). Designing multimedia learning environments using animated pedagogical agents: factors and issues. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00299.x

q3 · i? · review · r2

Review reports Moreno et al.'s (2001) detailed comparison of two learning conditions: an agent with only an iconic feature without facial expression and gaze versus a similar agent with a full expressive video image. No significant difference was found; equivalence was not tested and no effect size is printed.

"The study found that the two conditions do not produce any significant difference in terms of retention, transfer of learning, and participants' interest of learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id apa-appearance-null-effect
title Agent appearance (iconic vs realistic) shows no significant difference in retention, transfer, or interest
description Agent appearance (iconic vs realistic) shows no significant difference in retention, transfer, or interest
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2009
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — woo-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.