Claims

Workspaces became apparently disorganized, with incomplete and obsolete content, yet participants reported no difficulty using them to collaborate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Final workspaces appeared complex and messy to outside observers, but participants navigated them without difficulty. → Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers 2006 q2 i? Obsolete annotations and unrecorded relationship meanings cluttered the artifact while partners successfully inferred intended meanings. → Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers 2006 (2)

Evidence

Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers 2006

Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers. (2006). Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1: 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9001-1

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

In all sessions the workspaces became "extremely disorganized" collections with incomplete and obsolete content, yet "the participants reported no difficulty using them to collaborate" and said the workspace adequately supported their exchanges.

"These artifacts appear extremely disorganized, and contain a great deal of incomplete and obsolete content . Nonetheless, the participants reported no difficulty using them to collaborate"

Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers 2006 (2)

Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers. (2006). Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1: 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9001-1

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Participants indicated relationships by pointing, arrows or proximity but "the nature of the relationship was very rarely specified or recorded," leaving interpretation to the partner; this seemed consistently successful but left important information unrecorded.

"Some relationship was indicated in all of these cases, but the nature of the relationship was very rarely specified or recorded."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id apparent-disorganization-usable-workspaces
title Workspaces became apparently disorganized, with incomplete and obsolete content, yet participants reported no difficulty using them to collaborate
description Workspaces became apparently disorganized, with incomplete and obsolete content, yet participants reported no difficulty using them to collaborate
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2006
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — nathan-dwyer-daniel-d-suthers-2006, nathan-dwyer-daniel-d-suthers-2006-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.