Claims

Children appropriated their peri-personal physical space, drawing categories and boundaries with hands, arms, and whole body, including using the robot's position as a boundary marker

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Children used bodily actions and positions to define categories and boundaries between categories, physically drawing spaces in the air or on the floor. → Yanghee Kim · Michael Tscholl 2021

Evidence

Yanghee Kim · Michael Tscholl 2021

Yanghee Kim · Michael Tscholl. (2021). Young children's embodied interactions with a social robot. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09978-3

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative theme from Study Two: in response to the robot's question "what are animals?", one child stepped and pointed left for herbivores and right for carnivores, then moved both arms to encompass omnivores; another placed a hand on the floor toward the robot to separate robots from animals. Drawn spaces were typically larger than the children.

"Specifically, children used bodily actions and positions when they defined categories and the boundaries between the categories."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.