The AR group's mean score rose 4.5 points from pre-test (3.4) to post-test (7.9)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students taught with AR improved from a pre-test mean of 3.4 to a post-test mean of 7.9, a gain of 4.5 points, and no student failed. → Purificacion Toledo-Morales & Jose Manuel Sanchez-Garcia 2018

Evidence¶

Purificacion Toledo-Morales & Jose Manuel Sanchez-Garcia 2018¶

Purificacion Toledo-Morales & Jose Manuel Sanchez-Garcia. (2018). Use of Augmented Reality in Social Sciences as Educational Resource. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 19(3), Article 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1183349

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group pre/post comparison of the experimental group (5th A, 25 students) using t-test analysis in SPSS 23.0. The article reports the gain descriptively and notes grade distribution: "36% of students obtained qualification of outstanding and remarkable notable, 8% of good and 20% of approved. There was no suspense." No effect size is printed.

"students score higher after the use of the technology of AR in the teaching and learning process, because the average obtained with the pre-test is 3.4 and the post-test 7.9, with a difference of 4.5 points more"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The control group's mean score rose 3.2 points from pre-test (3.2) to post-test (6.4) under traditional teaching — related
• Primary students taught 'The Representation of the Earth' with AR scored higher on the post-test than students taught traditionally (M = 7.9 vs M = 6.4) — related