Primary students taught 'The Representation of the Earth' with AR scored higher on the post-test than students taught traditionally (M = 7.9 vs M = 6.4)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test comparison, the experimental group taught with AR obtained higher post-test qualifications (M = 7.9) than the control group taught traditionally (M = 6.4), a difference of 1.5 points. → Purificacion Toledo-Morales & Jose Manuel Sanchez-Garcia 2018

Evidence¶

Purificacion Toledo-Morales & Jose Manuel Sanchez-Garcia 2018¶

Purificacion Toledo-Morales & Jose Manuel Sanchez-Garcia. (2018). Use of Augmented Reality in Social Sciences as Educational Resource. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 19(3), Article 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1183349

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental study of 49 5th-grade students in Seville: experimental group (n = 25) taught with AR materials on tablets, control group (n = 24) taught traditionally, both pre- and post-tested with a 10-item multiple-choice test scored 0-10. The post-test comparison showed "a difference of score of 1.5" favouring the AR group; the article reports t-test analysis but prints no effect size.

"And those obtained in the post-test of both groups also said that the group experimental obtained qualifications more high (M = 7.9) that the group control (M = 6.4), with a difference of score of 1.5"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The AR group's mean score rose 4.5 points from pre-test (3.4) to post-test (7.9) — related
• The control group's mean score rose 3.2 points from pre-test (3.2) to post-test (6.4) under traditional teaching — related
• The tablet e-textbook experimental group significantly outperformed the traditionally taught control group on the post-test — related