AR applications have a medium positive pooled effect (ES = 0.517) on students' academic achievement compared with traditional learning methods¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Across 16 experimental studies, AR-supported learning environments produced a medium positive pooled effect size of 0.517 under the random-effects model on academic achievement. → Ozdemir M. 2018

Evidence¶

Ozdemir M. 2018¶

Ozdemir M., Sahin C., Arcagok S., & Demir M. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality applications in learning process: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 74, 165-186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.9

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 16 experimental studies (2007-2017, SSCI journals) comparing AR experimental groups with traditional-method control groups; effect sizes pooled under a random-effects model. The article reports "the effect value was found to be .517" with a 95% CI of .259 to 0.775, classified as a medium effect.

"In this respect, when the 16 studies comparing the effect of a learning environment supported by AR and the effect of a traditional learning environment not supported by AR on academic success were analyzed according to the Random-Effects Model, the upper and lower limits of a 95 confidence interval turned out to be 0.775 and .259, respectively, and the effect value was found to be .517."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Student-centred strategies, methods and techniques produce a moderate-to-high overall effect on primary school students' mathematics achievement compared to traditional teaching (ES = 0.787, random-effects model) — related
• Digital story applications have a high positive average effect on students' academic achievement compared to other teaching methods (ES = 0.750) — related
• STEM educational practices have a moderate positive effect on students' academic achievement compared with traditional teaching (REM ES = 0.442) — related
• Creativity-based learning applications show a large, positive pooled effect on students' academic achievement (ES = 0.850) — related
• The constructivist learning approach has a strong positive overall effect on students' academic achievement compared to traditional teaching methods (ES = 1.156). — related
• SRL scaffolds in computer-based learning environments produce a medium, significantly positive effect on academic performance (ES = 0.438) — related
• Problem-based learning shows a large positive pooled effect on academic achievement (REM ES = 1.560), with heterogeneous study effects — related
• A meta-analysis of three differentiated-instruction studies reports a pooled effect of 0.729 on academic achievement whose 95% confidence interval (−3.66 to 5.12) spans zero — related