Digital story applications have a high positive average effect on students' academic achievement compared to other teaching methods (ES = 0.750)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Across 94 effect sizes from 45 studies, lessons taught with digital story applications show an average effect size of 0.750 on students' academic achievement, in favor of the experimental group. → Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020
Evidence¶
Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban 2020¶
Nurullah Sahin and İsmail Coban. (2020). The effect of digital story applications on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. African Educational Research Journal, Special Issue 8(3), S62-S75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1274516
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-analysis of 94 effect sizes from 45 experimental studies comparing digital story lessons with other teaching methods, analyzed with CMA software under a random effects model. The average effect size was 0.750 (SE 0.057), with a 95% CI of 0.637 to 0.862, described as "a high impact on increasing students' academic achievements".
"When Table 4 is examined, as a result of the analysis performed according to random effects model, the average effect size value was calculated as 0.750 and the standard error was calculated as 0.057."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The digital story meta-analysis is resistant to publication bias by fail-safe N and trim-and-fill tests — related
- Publication type and study origin do not significantly moderate the digital story effect on academic achievement — related
- Student-centred strategies, methods and techniques produce a moderate-to-high overall effect on primary school students' mathematics achievement compared to traditional teaching (ES = 0.787, random-effects model) — related
- The constructivist learning approach has a strong positive overall effect on students' academic achievement compared to traditional teaching methods (ES = 1.156). — related
- Creativity-based learning applications show a large, positive pooled effect on students' academic achievement (ES = 0.850) — related
- STEM educational practices have a moderate positive effect on students' academic achievement compared with traditional teaching (REM ES = 0.442) — related
- AR applications have a medium positive pooled effect (ES = 0.517) on students' academic achievement compared with traditional learning methods — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.