Claims

Real-time augmented reality speed overlays nearly doubled novice instrument velocity in bimanual carrying, with gains retained at two weeks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the single AR study, the AR-speed subgroup's mean instrument velocity almost doubled in bimanual carrying (21 to 38 mm/sec, p < 0.05) and improvements remained at two-week interval testing. → Shakir T 2026

Evidence

Shakir T 2026

Shakir T, Lingam G, Boal M, Francis N, Chand M. (2026). Technology-enhanced training in basic robotic surgical skills: a systematic review. Journal of Robotic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03633-w

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports a single prospective cohort study of 30 medical students receiving real-time AR overlays of speed, grip force or relative inter-instrument movement during three simulator tasks. The AR speed subgroup showed the quoted velocity gain; the review rates AR evidence base as low.

"Greatest improvements were noted in the AR speed group, whereby mean instrument velocity almost doubled in a bimanual carrying task from 21 to 38 mm/sec (p < 0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.