Claims

AR-assisted training improves GOALS Global scores in novice laparoscopic learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Participants trained with AR scored an average of 2.40 points higher on GOALS Global than controls (95% CI [1.30, 3.50], p < 0.001), with moderate-quality GRADE evidence. → Xiong Jian 2024

Evidence

Xiong Jian 2024

Xiong Jian, Dai Xiaoqin, Zhang Yuyang, Liu Xingchao, Zhou Xiyuan. (2024). Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis (generic inverse variance in RevMan 5.4) of three studies reporting GOALS Global during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The pooled mean difference favored AR: "2.40 points higher than controls" with p < 0.001; GRADE rated the evidence moderate quality (MD: 1.53 points; 95% CI [0.48, 2.57]).

"Three studies reported this outcome, indicating that participants trained with AR scored an average of 2.40 points higher than controls (95% CI [1.30, 3.50], p < 0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.