Claims

AR-assisted training improves OSATS Global scores in novice laparoscopic learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Participants using AR in training showed a mean OSATS Global difference of 7.71 points over controls (95% CI [3.39, 12.03], p < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 41%). → Xiong Jian 2024

Evidence

Xiong Jian 2024

Xiong Jian, Dai Xiaoqin, Zhang Yuyang, Liu Xingchao, Zhou Xiyuan. (2024). Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis pooling three studies reporting OSATS Global. The article reports "a mean difference of 7.71 points" favoring AR, p < 0.001, I2 = 41%; GRADE rated the evidence moderate quality (MD: 2.07 points; 95% CI [0.34, 3.79]).

"Participants utilizing AR in their training demonstrated a mean difference of 7.71 points compared to controls (95% CI [3.39, 12.03], p < 0.001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.