Participants rated the arithmetic-error peer agent more harshly than the conceptual-error peer agent, calibrating trust by error observability rather than severity¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across nearly every rated dimension, the arithmetic-error peer Alice was rated more harshly than the conceptual-error peer Charlie, despite both being designed as error-prone peers. → Harsh Kumar 2026
Evidence¶
Harsh Kumar 2026¶
Harsh Kumar, Zi Kang (Jace) Mu, Jonathan Vincentius, Ashton Anderson. (2026). Human Thinking under Plural LLM Assistance: Mathematical Problem Solving and Open-Ended Writing. Working Paper, July 2026, Toronto, Canada. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02677 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.02677
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Post-survey agent ratings (competence, warmth, helpfulness, trustworthiness, 1–5 Likert) in Experiment-1; the authors interpret the asymmetry as trust calibrated to the observability of errors rather than their severity, an interpretation rather than a tested result.
"participants rated Alice (strong concepts, arithmetic errors) more harshly than Charlie (accurate arithmetic, conceptual errors) on nearly every dimension, despite both being designed as error-prone peers."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers of color are judged more harshly in evaluations: within the same schools, Black teachers were 50 percent more likely than white teachers to receive a low rating. — related
- Degree of anthropomorphism attributed to the agent was shaped by both interaction modality and, within audio conditions, voice accent — related
- Role ambiguity for a Black-accented agent destabilized trust, culminating in breakdown after the agent inaccurately tracked group decisions — related
- Speakers rate their own speeches more harshly than independent judges do — related
- Expert evaluators rate PIVOT higher than TheoremExplainAgent across nearly all instructional dimensions, with the largest gains in Physics and Computer Science — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
arithmetic-errors-rated-harsher-than-conceptual-errors |
title |
Participants rated the arithmetic-error peer agent more harshly than the conceptual-error peer agent, calibrating trust by error observability rather than severity |
description |
Participants rated the arithmetic-error peer agent more harshly than the conceptual-error peer agent, calibrating trust by error observability rather than severity |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — harsh-kumar-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.