Claims

Participants rated the arithmetic-error peer agent more harshly than the conceptual-error peer agent, calibrating trust by error observability rather than severity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across nearly every rated dimension, the arithmetic-error peer Alice was rated more harshly than the conceptual-error peer Charlie, despite both being designed as error-prone peers. → Harsh Kumar 2026

Evidence

Harsh Kumar 2026

Harsh Kumar, Zi Kang (Jace) Mu, Jonathan Vincentius, Ashton Anderson. (2026). Human Thinking under Plural LLM Assistance: Mathematical Problem Solving and Open-Ended Writing. Working Paper, July 2026, Toronto, Canada. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02677 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.02677

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Post-survey agent ratings (competence, warmth, helpfulness, trustworthiness, 1–5 Likert) in Experiment-1; the authors interpret the asymmetry as trust calibrated to the observability of errors rather than their severity, an interpretation rather than a tested result.

"participants rated Alice (strong concepts, arithmetic errors) more harshly than Charlie (accurate arithmetic, conceptual errors) on nearly every dimension, despite both being designed as error-prone peers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id arithmetic-errors-rated-harsher-than-conceptual-errors
title Participants rated the arithmetic-error peer agent more harshly than the conceptual-error peer agent, calibrating trust by error observability rather than severity
description Participants rated the arithmetic-error peer agent more harshly than the conceptual-error peer agent, calibrating trust by error observability rather than severity
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — harsh-kumar-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.