Claims

Speakers rate their own speeches more harshly than independent judges do

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Participants consistently rated themselves harshly relative to judges (M's of 3.02 versus 4.66, t(60) = 5.90, p < .001). → Jones Christopher R. 2012

Evidence

Jones Christopher R. 2012

Jones Christopher R., Fazio Russell H., Vasey Michael W. (2012). Attentional Control Buffers the Effect of Public Speaking Anxiety on Performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430166

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Comparison of self-assessed and judge-rated speech quality on the same 0-10 scale in the Results section of the 61-participant study. Although the two ratings correlated significantly (r = .47, p < .001), "participants consistently rated themselves harshly relative to judges (M's of 3.02 versus 4.66, t(60) = 5.90, p < .001)".

"we also found that participants consistently rated themselves harshly relative to judges (M's of 3.02 versus 4.66, t(60) = 5.90, p < .001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id self-assessments-harsher-than-judges
title Speakers rate their own speeches more harshly than independent judges do
description Speakers rate their own speeches more harshly than independent judges do
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jones-christopher-r-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.