Claims

The prediction power of specific processing speed for mathematics decreases with reduced arithmetic fluency: complex multiplication did not predict mathematics although it predicted Chinese and English

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Complex multiplication failed to account for variance in mathematics achievement in either grade, while simple and complex subtraction did. → Cheng Dazhi 2022 q2 i? Complex multiplication did predict Chinese and English in both grades, with ΔR² between 0.029 and 0.039. → Cheng Dazhi 2022 (2)

Evidence

Cheng Dazhi 2022

Cheng Dazhi, Shi Kaihui, Wang Naiyi, Miao Xinyang, Zhou Xinlin. (2022). Examining the Differential Role of General and Specific Processing Speed in Predicting Mathematical Achievement in Junior High School. Journal of Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10010001

q2 · i? · associational · r2

In the Grade 7 and Grade 9 hierarchical regressions, complex multiplication showed non-significant ΔR² for mathematics (0.020 and 0.014 in Table 2), below the Bonferroni-corrected threshold; equivalence was not tested.

"However, complex multiplication could not account for the variances in mathematical achievement, even after controlling for age, gender, nonverbal matrix reasoning, spatial abilities, and visual attention."

Cheng Dazhi 2022 (2)

Cheng Dazhi, Shi Kaihui, Wang Naiyi, Miao Xinyang, Zhou Xinlin. (2022). Examining the Differential Role of General and Specific Processing Speed in Predicting Mathematical Achievement in Junior High School. Journal of Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10010001

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The same regression models show complex multiplication significantly predicting Chinese, English, and total scores at Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, with the printed ΔR² values as quoted.

"complex multiplication predicted variances in Chinese (ΔR2 = 0.033, p < 0.05) and English (ΔR2 = 0.034, p < 0.05) in Grade 7 and Chinese (ΔR2 = 0.029, p < 0.05), English (ΔR2 = 0.039, p < 0.01), and total scores (ΔR2 = 0.033, p < 0.05) in Grade 9."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id arithmetic-fluency-gradient-complex-multiplication-null-for-math
title The prediction power of specific processing speed for mathematics decreases with reduced arithmetic fluency: complex multiplication did not predict mathematics although it predicted Chinese and English
description The prediction power of specific processing speed for mathematics decreases with reduced arithmetic fluency: complex multiplication did not predict mathematics although it predicted Chinese and English
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — cheng-dazhi-2022, cheng-dazhi-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.